Petition to Expose and End Electronic Weapons Torture

Mind Control and the Media: Part 1  Part 2  Part 3  Part 4  Part 5  Part 6

The Execution of Emily Rose: Part 1  Part 2  Part 3

The Subliminals of Doctor Strangelove and the case for HIV being either a created or an allowed 'plague epidemic' in support of a ruthless moralistic agenda.  I do accuse Stanley Kubrick, Stephen King, Stephen Spielberg and Dan O'Bannon of having knowledge of that disease for a decade and a half before the first published medical report (which was itself a denial) and, rather than warning the world and saving lives, only 'signing' about it - the equivalent of knowing that a bus is barreling down on a crowd of people and doing nothing.  Having known about it for so long, it is likely that the disproportionate ethnic/racial effect of that disease were known as well.  One has to wonder if the powers that be are STILL dragging their feet and only providing the appearance of concern for the benefit of public relations.  The signs clearly indicate that the network despises such behaviors as sodomy.  Why would the network not appreciate a natural or semi-natural self-propogating assistant in their efforts?
Part 1 Part 2  Part 3  Part 4  Part 5  Part 6

Symbol Compilations:
Game
Mirror
Cat
Bird

All videos: All

U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE
Major General William A. Stofft
Commandant
STRATEGIC STUDIES INSTITUTE

Director - Colonel John W. Mountcastle
Director of Research - Dr. Earl H. Tilford, Jr.
Authors - Dr. Steven Metz and Lieutenant Colonel James Kievit
 

The use of new technology may also run counter to basic American values.  Information age--and in particular information warfare--technologies cause concerns about privacy.  For example, the individual position locator raises several thorny issues: Would Americans overseas be forced to wear (or worse have implanted) such a device or would its use be voluntary? If forced, would it apply equally to those employed overseas and tourists? Will Americans accept the fact that the government might, by access to the NEO locator data base, know every move they make? If a locator device could be remotely activated, how could Americans be sure that activation was only effective outside the United States? How would they know that "wrist radios" were not used to monitor personal conversations? Similarly, military use of television against foreign adversaries raises the specter of domestic applications. Even if domestic use was never contemplated, its possibility might cause greater public skepticism regarding television appearances, reducing the impact of one of the American politician's greatest communication tools. Deception, while frequently of great military or political value, is thought of as somehow "un-American."

American values also make the use of directed energy weapons against suspected narcotrafficking aircraft technologically feasible but morally difficult, perhaps unacceptable. The advantage of directed energy weapons over conventional ones is deniability.  Against whom is such deniability aimed?

Deniability must be aimed at the American people, who do not sanction the imprisonment, much less execution, of individuals without a trial (and execution is how they will perceive it--the argument "we only disabled the aircraft, it was the crash which killed the pilot" will carry little weight). [But the magic of an electronics disrupting directed energy attack is that it leaves no forensic trail either with the disabled aircraft itself or back to the source of the attack.  Directed energy attacks don't necessarily burn holes in things.]

American values and attitudes thus form significant constraints on full use of emerging technology, at least in anything short of a perceived war for national survival. Overcoming these constraints to make a RMA in conflict short of war would require fundamental changes in the United States--an ethical and political revolution may be necessary to make a military revolution.

[When Spieberg includes a scene in Close Encounters in which a group of people in red jump suits are told that angels will watch over them and Roy Neary is followed, bewildered, fired, divorced and harassed all the way to Wyoming to ultimately volunteer for military service, or Jennifer Lopez literally chases a killer around in his own mind while comforting his inner child in 'The Cell', or Will Ferrel is dogged each day by an unwanted voice in 'Stranger than Fiction', the screenwriters of each are working either directly or indirectly with one or more federal agencies (often weaving in material derived from the lives of actual living persons of interest) to prepare the public at large for precisely that future - a future in which targeted people are surveilled, tormented, humiliated and destroyed invisibly while their government hides in deniability.  There have been hundreds of similar examples over the years and decades, which represent far more than simple creative expression.  In fact, they, with perhaps the very best of intentions, though perhaps without an understanding of the bigger picture of which they are an active part, are slowly priming the public to feel comfortable in an extremely well managed way with nothing less than the surreptitious surveillance of thought itself 24/7, harassments like so-called voice-to-skull, remotely induced migraine pain and numerous other forms of harassment that are part of a system that allows such things for as long as a lifetime without a single day in court or official word of justification offered at all EVER.]

-------------------------------------------------------

[Metz and Kievit included the following scenario that projects plausible events occurring between approximately two and fifteen years from the year in which they wrote this paper in 1994.  Only the authors can say what secretive and conjectured realities their scenario actually draws from, though all of it apparently falls within the realm of possibillity.]

The revolutionaries first task was to recruit proselytes throughout the government and national security community. Initially the revolutionaries, who called their new strategic concept "Dynamic Defense," were opposed by isolationists who felt that new technology should be used simply to build an impenetrable electronic and physical barrier around the United States. Eventually the revolutionaries convinced the president-elect following the campaign of 2000 that Dynamic Defense was both feasible and effective--a task made easier by his background as a pioneering entrepreneur in the computer-generated and controlled "perception-molding" systems developed by the advertising industry. The President was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA in conflict short of war.

The first step in implementing Dynamic Defense was reshaping the national security organization and its underlying attitudes and values.  Technology provided opportunity; only intellectual change could consolidate it. With the full and active support of the President, the revolutionaries reorganized the American national security system to make maximum use of emerging technology and new ideas.

One of the turning points of the revolution came when its leaders convinced the President and key members of Congress that traditional American ethics were a major hinderance to the RMA. This was crucial:  the revolutionaries and their allies then crafted the appropriate attitudinal vessel for the RMA. Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic "consciousness-raising," old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national sovereignty changed. This was relatively easy since frustration with domestic crime had already begun to alter attitudes and values. In fact, the RMA in conflict short of war was, in many ways, a spin-off of the domestic "war on drugs and crime" of the late 1990s when the military, as predicted by William Mendel in 1994, became heavily involved in support to domestic law enforcement.  The changes in American values that accompanied that struggle were easily translated to the national security arena. Once the norms concerning personal privacy changed, law soon followed.

With values changed, technology then opened the door to profound innovation. Vast improvements in surveillance systems and information processing made it possible to monitor a large number of enemies (and potential enemies). In the pre-RMA days, psychological operations and psychological warfare were primitive. As they advanced into the electronic and bioelectronic era, it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and domestic. Cutting-edge pharmaceutical technology also provided tools for national security strategists.

Sometimes the revolutionaries found it necessary to stoke the development of technology designed specifically for conflict short of war. Whenever possible, profitability was used to encourage private and quasi-private enterprises to develop appropriate technology. For example, much of the lucrative technology of surveillance, intelligence collection, and attitude manipulation used to solve the domestic crime problem was easily adapted to conflict short of war. The same held for new weapons, especially nonlethal biological ones and advanced psychotechnology. Only when there was absolutely no expectation of profit did the government directly sponsor research of cutting-edge technology, often with funds freed by disbanding what were seen as increasingly irrelevant conventional military forces.

The actual strategy built on the RMA was divided into three tracks. The first sought to perpetuate the revolution. Its internal dimension institutionalized the organizational and attitudinal changes that made the revolution possible, and pursued future breakthroughs in close conjunction with business, the scientific community, and local law enforcement agencies--the core troika of 21st century security. The external dimension actively sought to delay or prevent counterresponses by controlling information and through well-orchestrated deception.

The operation officially began when the President transferred the Cuban portfolio from the Conflict Preemption Agency to the Conflict Containment Agency. An existing contingency plan with implementing software provided the framework for quick action. Immediately, all electronic communication in and out of Cuba was surreptitiously transferred to the national security filter at Fort Meade. This allowed full monitoring, control, and, when necessary, manipulation of private, commercial, and government signals. Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the Comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as "potential" or "active," with sophisticated computerized personality simulations used to develop, tailor, and focus psychological campaigns for each.  Individuals and organizations with active predilections to support the insurgency were targets of an elaborate global ruse using computer communications networks and appeals by a computer-generated insurgent leader. Real insurgent leaders who were identified were left in place so that sophisticated computer analysis of their contacts could be developed. Internecine conflict within the insurgent elite was engineered using psychotechnology. Psychological operations included traditional propaganda as well as more aggressive steps such as drug assisted subliminal conditioning. At the same time, Cubans within the United States and around the world were assigned maximum surveillance status to monitor their physical presence and communications webs. 

Since all Americans in Cuba had been bioelectrically tagged and monitored during the initial stages of the conflict, the NEO went smoothly, including the mandatory health screening of all those returning to the United States. Coast Guard aircraft and hovercraft stanched illegal refugees. The attitude-shaping campaigns aimed at the American public, the global public, and the Cuban people went quite well, including those parts using computer-generated broadcasts by insurgent leaders--"morphing"-- in which they were shown as disoriented and psychotic. Subliminal messages surreptitiously integrated with Cuban television transmissions were also helpful.  In fact, all of this was so successful that there were only a few instances of covert, stand-off military strikes when insurgent targets arose and government forces seemed on the verge of defeat. U.S. strike forces also attacked neutral targets to support the psychological campaign as computer-generated insurgent leaders claimed credit for the raids. At times, even the raids themselves were computer-invented "recreations."  (These were a specialty of the Army's elite Sun Tzu Battalion.)

Many of the difficult-to-detect drugs and psychotechnology developed for use in conflict short of war have appeared on the domestic black market and, increasingly, in American schools and workplaces. Perhaps most important, Americans are beginning to question the economic, human, and ethical costs of our new strategy. A political movement called the "New Humanitarianism" is growing, especially among Americans of non-European descent, and seems likely to play a major role in the presidential election of 2012. There are even rumblings of discontent within the national security community as the full meaning of the revolution becomes clear. Since the distinction between the military and non-military components of our national security community has eroded...

-----------------------------------------

Advances in sensors and other elements of information technology may bring great benefits to conventional, combined-arms warfare, but will have less impact in conflict short of war, which is most often won or lost through the manipulation of images, beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions.  These things rather than troop concentrations, command and control nodes, and transportation infrastructure are the key military targets in conflict short of war. This makes psychological technology much more important than strike technology. Ways must be found to use emerging technology, including advanced artificial intelligence and information dissemination systems, to help military strategists develop, implement, and continually improve methods of influencing opinion, mobilizing public support, and sometimes demobilizing it. There is also the potential for defensive pyschotechnology such as "strategic personality simulations" to aid national security decision makers.  To date, most analysts feel that the RMA has not generated adequate advances in such "soft war" capabilities or even the promise of such gains. But ultimate success in applying the RMA to conflict short of war hinges on the development of psychotechnology. As this emerges, it could be tested for political acceptability by using it first in non-lethal operations other than war like humanitarian relief and nation assistance.

Today, two RMAs may be underway simultaneously. The first (and more mature) is electronic.  Its manifestations are improved C4I and precision strike systems. The second (and  potentially more profound) RMA is biotechnological, including genetic engineering and advanced behavior-altering drugs.  Because of the compression of time and the shortening of historical patterns, the biotechnical revolution is totally enmeshed with the electronic. It may ultimately be the combination of the two that proves truly revolutionary.

New on the Internet: a community of people who believe the government is beaming voices into their minds. They may be crazy, but the Pentagon has pursued a weapon that can do just that.

IF HARLAN GIRARD IS CRAZY, HE DOESN'T ACT THE PART...

"It's undeniable that the technology exists," Girard says, "but if you go to the police and say, 'I'm hearing voices,' they're going to lock you up for psychiatric evaluation."

And that is a big part of why it is being done at all.  The number of people being harassed in such ways are relatively few.  The people involved in the stalking have been convinced that targeted people are sick, immoral or otherwise dangerous and are much more numerous.  Many participants in the creative, news and advertising media work to enhance and exploit that impression and that the subject is just traditional folklore (or is taboo) and inhibit reports by targeted individuals from the news or spin them as crazy talk.  The tactics and technologies are transparent and leave no trace.  And that is the skeletal outline for a system of harassment and control that has persisted for decades and may well be permanent.  The only problem is that it is also desperately unfair.  Targets become perpetual slaves to location independent surveillance presumably involving implants, their fate apparently sealed, their only choice to obey without question.  It's wonderful, as long as it's happening to someone else.

HARLAN GIRARD SAYS HIS PROBLEMS BEGAN IN 1983, while he was a real estate developer in Los Angeles. The harassment was subtle at first: One day a woman pulled up in a car, wagged her finger at him, then sped away; he saw people running underneath his window at night; he noticed some of his neighbors seemed to be watching him; he heard someone moving in the crawl space under his apartment at night.

Girard sought advice from his then-girlfriend, a practicing psychologist, whom he declines to identify. He says she told him, "Nobody can become psychotic in their late 40s." She said he didn't seem to manifest other symptoms of psychotic behavior -- he dressed well, paid his bills -- and, besides his claims of surveillance, which sounded paranoid, he behaved normally.

The paper was titled "From Psyop to Mind War:  The Psychology of Victory" and it presented a Machiavelian scheme for waging perpetual psychological warfare against friend and enemy populations alike and even against the American people.

[General] Aquino's thesis stated that enemy populations could be subdued by inflicting a state of psychological terror and feelings of eminent destruction, shock and awe in other words.  He discusses the use of psychotronic weapons or electronic weapons that influence the mind.  Capitulation could be induced without firing a shot by using signals piggybacked on broadcasts of radio, TV [possibly readable as innuendo, metaphor and such] and microwave communications to influence through subliminal suggestion, holograms, voice-to-skull and silent sound technologies to manipulate the feelings and thoughts of the target population.  During the 1960s he was prominent in the Church of Satan.

In the late 1980s, Aquino was accused by the San Francisco Police Department of being involved in a Satanic child molestation ring centered on a Presidio military base where Aquino was stationed at the time.

He is now one of the highest ranking officers in the NSA.

Whether the satanic thing is some weird psy-ops facade or not, the paper he wrote is still real and corroborates what targeted people have been screaming about for years.  Bombs and bullets leave some forensic trail back to the persons who fire them.  Some forms of directed energy weapons leave no trace evidence that they have been employed at all.  And that simple fact is the deadliest weapon of all.

I myself am a target of just such a campaign (see below).  It has involved over ten years of surveillance and harassment of myself coupled with constant, unwanted, mocking, ridiculing, hyper-critical, debilitating, deceptive, dishonest, discouraging, confusing, depressing, pro-MC, leave-no-trace semi-communications at home and elsewhere so as to needle me for useful information and outbursts, to attempt to provoke a pretext for entry into psychiatry or prison and to keep me in perpetual pain and in a state of depression and hopelessness.  It has involved the use of numerous participants in the creative, advertising and news media who parody (and other private individuals who otherwise spin) aspects of that material in way that is favorable to the orchestrators of that long operation (presumably the FBI) so as to sway the opinions of a growing subset of the public while conveying no unambiguous facts whatsoever, essentially building a mountan of insinuated heresay that is designed to be impossible to prove as being oriented toward myself.  It has involved a quiet effort to link me to that material behind the scenes via word of mouth and to encourage me to effectively take ownership of those parodies by refuting them publicly in order to effectively assist their effort in linking me to it, while never mentioning my name and excluding me entirely from that media carnival all the while and preventing any legal recourse.  The result seems to be that they have created an artificially ugly and exaggerated image (primarily of their own manufacture) and insured that no fair contest will ever take place.  The news media has never had ANYTHING to say and National Public Radio in particular, instead of reporting the fact of the matter, has had a great deal of fun participating in the carnival over the last few years.  Their participation is not without precedent - after all, veteran reporter Daniel Schorr chose to act as a kind of virtual hired hitman in the movie The Game.  Fascinating.  I'm not the only one and I'm not the first.  It is part of a larger and older trend to achieve a variety of goals that leaves the FBI, CIA and other federal agencies and participating private citizens free from responsibility for their own actions and the technologies and tactics employed perpetually insulated from accountability that some refer to as 'mind control'.

"And if mind control has its way.
Will there be but one road left someday?"

Before disregarding the claim that a headline in a newspaper prop or an inconsequential line or two of dialog was designed so as to be a personal trigger, consider first what its makers have to lose in including it, which is nothing whatsoever.  Then consider what they potentially have to gain, which could be supporting evidence for a diagnosis of delusion (among other purposes).  Most targets are all too easy to disregard. Some are not.  Those sometimes warrant special 'attention'.

Devil's Advocate 1 (9.8 Meg)
Devil's Advocate 2 (13.2Meg)

The names Kevin, Eddie, Melissa, Pam, Jacksonville, Georgia Tech and the mention of a half sister are all dropped in the film.  I have two friends in this world, one named Kevin and another named Eddie, I worked at Georgia Tech for a decade and a half and I have long reported being harassed there and elsewhere in several clever ways for nearly that many years since before this film was released, some details of which roughly correspond to the film in a general way.  Kevin is just about the most normal, honest and decent person I have ever known, has never gotten into any trouble and now works at Oak Ridge, managing sofware developers for the military.  Beyond the dropping of his name, I can't find a hint of him anywhere between the lines there.  Eddie IS the most honest, decent and ordinary person I have ever known, has also never gotten into any trouble, works for a small town interior decorator and doesn't even smoke cigarettes.  My half sister Melissa is a tad on the wild side, but is otherwise pretty harmless and one of her old friends' last name is Leamon.  I have a cousin named Diana.  I know of two Pams from my home state of Tennessee who are targeted individuals, both of whom I met years after this film was made (Prophecy?  No.  Planning and manipulation?  Probably.) and who correspond to the manipulative Pam character in name only.  My father is a retired trial lawyer and a good one, though I don't believe he ever took part in a murder case and beyond being a fool is only slightly more evil than your average lawyer.  Kevin Lomax's mother appears to mirror (if anyone) the very religious mother of one of the women I once loved.   My big sister's middle name is Alice.  Variations on the name 'Christ' are a hallmark of creative media MC.  Jackie may represent a variation upon the name Jackson.  Triggers tend to be hidden in the clever language and symbolism (such as Keanu Reeves being directed to hold a red cylindrical cushion in such a way as to suggest both the color red and something phallic) and generally do not correspond to the overt imagery and storyline of the film, which (along with the Milton character and the demons) mirrors MC itself more than anything else, though it does sometimes appear to mirror me, for example in the dropping of the term 'humanist' (though not in the details of dialog from that evil character, which I do NOT assume responsibility for).  There are some truths embedded into the film and some embarassments and shames for me and others to swallow, though the general context is entirely fictional.  There is no one-to-one correspondence between any real world individual and any character in the film, although the filmmakers have taken the sins of several people (some I have never met and/or know of only by having chosen to observe and thereby partake of) and embodied those into one or more individual characters from the film and, by associating the character with an actual person (by word of mouth or uninformed assumption), allowed others to assume that those lumped sins belong to that person - just one of the reckless aspects of the mockingbird technique.  In at least one situation, I noticed a totally innocent wish by an old love to have children, a wish thwarted by ovarian cysts, presented in such a way that the simplistic and vague reference to it in the film could be interpreted as a reference to sin.  I.e. When you know (or think you know) how to read mockingbird, whenever you notice the word 'baby', you are likely to assume something bad.  Now I find myself literally surrounded by street mockers apparently reacting to the reckless signs and vaguely parroting them back at me.  I hope some of those people that I have known are not suffering the same fate.  That's war for you.

Although the CIA, the FBI, the NSA or whoever the real devils behind my long clandestine persecution actually are and who orchestrate the efforts of MC screenwriters and directors with information drawn from surveillance, the filmmakers may either have been making an effort to slander/defame me and my friends, old loves and family within the context of that film or perhaps to lead me to think so as part of other pressure tactics and mind gaming of which this film is a part.  By the way, I have never met either a triple or a single murderer to the best of my knowledge, so the screenwriter is either triggering one or more people that I have never met and/or are just adding some horror to the mix both for strategic reasons and, of course, in the need for an entertaining and emotionally charged storyline to sell tickets.  The choice of the name 'Mary Ann' partially represents a marijuana trigger for people who enjoy marijuana (which I was at the time and before this film was made), just as the title of the television series 'Painkiller Jane' is intentionally suggestive of the pain reduction properties of marijuana (also known as 'Mary Jane').  The change in hair color from blonde to black may well be an odd entrapment tactic that has been in the planning stages for years. You'll notice the tongue and nails metaphor (a forced to silence symbol not unlike the sealed mouth moment in The Matrix and a self-serving transposition of a collection of real-world conservative attack tactics into a fictional criminal defendant) and the cough messaging attack tactic with which it is bound up (which, again self-servingly, is a voluntary behavior rather than a result of some voodoo nonsense).  There is the standard mirroring metaphor and green and red color symbolism.  Of course, MC attackers don't literally turn into demons as pictured.  Instead, they drop 'triggers' and turn into hypocrites and only SEEM like demons to the people they psychologically needle.  And yes, they can literally turn normal people into mental cases and thrust them into institutions, suicide and violent outbursts under false and contrived circumstances.  And yes, they do pretend innocence of their own actions.  Notice the clear suggestion of COINTELPRO style use of the media to defame, slander and apply pressure.  The Weaver commission (i.e. to weave together) thing represents MC itself (and amusingly seems to imply that MC is orchestrated by the devil himself).  Voice-to-skull and dream manipulation technology that is perceptible to a target and to noone else are hinted at.

The network self-servingly likes to call MC a 'test'.  MC can be a frame-up, a psychological attack, a run down, a pro-MC propaganda and disinformation campaign, a form of continuous brutal interrogation, a long and drawn out kind of esoteric murder, a kind of slavery to constant surveillance and harassment, a form of social warfare and sometimes all of those at once.  But the one thing that it is not is a test, unless it were a test of a person's ability to withstand hardship and cruelty.  Does the Mary Ann character appear to be undergoing... a test?  And what recourse would she have other than to go violently berserk or commit suicide as pictured?  Unfortunately, her engineered demise is no great exaggeration and is a fairly accurate portrayal of the persecutions that many real world targeted individuals are forced to endure.  Trivia buffs might notice the dropping of the name 'Gaff' and the Chinese merchant which harken back to the movie Blade Runner, another creative MC work.  In this film, the references to green refer to both sins/transgressions and to marijuana and dates back (in terms of the Mary Ann character at least) to several years before the movie was even released back in 1997, so that is old and inconsequential history.

The network's line 'Acquital after acquital after acquital!' (ironically dropped by the devil himself) is probably the network's best argument in the film (as well as the inclusion of the triple murder premise, of course).  Yes, the court system is clogged and inefficient, lawyers (damn them) do (or should) fight tooth and claw to defend their clients just as they are obligated by law to do, and guilty people do sometimes go free.  Playing the devil's advocate for a moment, I'll respond to that argument.  Every advance in technology and government secrecy, whether it be genetics, forensics, surveillance and information management, sharing and storage or the astonishing technologies and tactics of MC itself almost invariably benefit the state and conservative culture to the exclusion of the defendant and the privacy and rights of citizens and more liberal and dissenting culture.  Unfortunately, the state is also assuming the right (with no legal means to stop it or to prove that it is doing so at all) to literally surveill, manipulate and harass targeted persons 24/7 for years or decades on end and to do away with courtrooms entirely and evade its own responsibilities to those citizens, at least in some situations.

On a personal basis, if I committed suicide tomorrow, the news media would report nothing at all except for a wink and a smirk for the benefit of the network to say "Job well done!"  If I went violently berserk, the news soundbyte would read, "Crazy delusional writes rambling letter!  Thinks he's Keanu Reeves!" and little else, while carefully failing to draw anyone's attention to AFAFA at all.  My long persecution began well before this film was released, shows no signs of ever ending and has never included one single official word of explanation or day in court.  And it never will, unless of course I were to go berserk, in which case, my reports of the persecution itself would be simultaneously denied AND used to support a diagnosis of mental disorder.  And so it goes.

Also, the by now huge (though still clandestine) media and COINTELPRO snowball (of which this film is an inner layer in time) surrounds a nucleus of sin that (I believe at least) is so small in proportion, that the snowball is by now the only thing that really matters in this long esoteric situation and it behooves my persecutors to keep the actual reality (and my voice) out of the picture as much as possible, to fill the space with as much spin and repetition of those sins as possible and to disallow any legal confrontation whatsoever.  There is simply too much at stake for it to be otherwise and they have far too much to hide, not the least of which are their numerous means of social and psychological strangulation.  Soon enough, I'll be gone and the snowball will have won and will echo its message through the airwaves for years to come.  In fact, they have been suggesting suicide quite frequently lately (via electromagnetic bee sting for maximum cover) to finally free the snowball of its human umbilical for good.  And they who own the present and the past will monopolize the future too.  And neither my nor any other (still free and talking) targeted person's full name will have been uttered even once.

Almost always, the network, as part of its media mockingbird psychological warfare against me, peels off much of the truth from the rind, and then proceeds to refill the rind with their own message, implicitly sticking the bad implications to me.  Time and time again.  The Ad Council's bigot in the restaurant commercial is one good example.  I used the phrase 'No behindo, comprende?' in reference to another subject.  They meld it into that commercial.  I am and have always been one of the most polite persons in the nation to strangers of any and all races and nationalities whom I have not met and have no prior impression about, particularly working people, (DESPITE the hundreds of people of any and all races who have sought to pick fights with me as part of my fight club persecution) and everyone who knows me knows it.  Ad Council, you are a clever LIAR and you KNOW it.  And everyone who thinks they know how to read the material just eats it right up, because Ad Council's voice is loud and professionally produced, their fellows are many, and their overt commercial message is usually moral, virtuous and/or sensible.  Those readers (some of whom I have trained to read by taking note of these things and identifying their mockingbird association to me) are more manipulated than I am.  And that is saying a lot.  To be a 'Manchurian candidate' IS to be used.  Yet, so gossamer and ambiguous is its association to me that they can always deny these facts and claim delusion.  The black magic of mockingbird.

You might notice the Melissa Black character and her line about having "heard weather coming on the news", a character that in part references Miss Melissa Block of National Public Radio and her own role as a mockingbird.  She is far from the only mockingbird at NPR.
 

There are the early accounts of the Point Pleasant, West Virginia citizens who report have seen a red eyed flying creature.  There is the book by John Keel.  There is the film 'The Mothman Prophecies'.  And there is the growing mythology that is a product of all three.

From Peter Rogerson's review of "Mothman: The Facts Behind the Legend", "The so-called TNT, the disused ordnance depot and manufacturing plant area, had become a sort of playground for local youths, for sex and drag racing and such, like a sort of  permissive zone outside the town limits."  By now, I know the trappings (no pun intended) of MC well enough that I just did a search on 'Point Pleasant'+'sex' and knew that an inkling of the real truth behind the mythology would quickly pop up, if the suggestive aspects of the film weren't enough to expect as much.  And that quickly lead me to the review.

Anyway, in view of Rogerson's observation, it's pretty clear that the sightings were probably an effort to scare people away from the area and to break up the activity going on there and in other parts of the town and more importantly to experiment and apply some of the ever evolving techniques of so-called 'mind control' in a nice out of the way region of the country ( that may have been related to a counter culture movement that was flourishing in the western Virginia area in the mid sixties).  MC is always dressed up in mythology, indirection and other forms of subterfuge like act of God, mysticism and alien and ghost mythology.  Keeping the public incredulous and half believing such things is a major component of the old black art of MC.  Another aspect of MC is to terrify and the reports of a fearsome, red-eyed, car chasing, dog mutilating 'creature' fit that template well.

I believe that there are two possibilities concerning John Keel.  One is that he was a targeted individual at some point prior to 1966 and incorporated that experience, which he did not fully understand, into a growing fascination with UFOs, ghost and parapsychological phenomena.  Many, perhaps most targets, are pummeled cruelly and relentlessly over their sins, even to the point of suicide.  After all, that appears to be what MC is designed to do, as well as to be extraordinarily resistant to being legally or factually pinned down in any way.  It also makes optimal use of ignorance.  So Rogerson's words, "Mothman Prophecy seems an ideal post 9/11 story, with its sense of vague menace and apocalyptic imagery of urban breakdown and some coming event of mass destruction." and "Keel's vision of terrorism and urban collapse" appear to support that possibility.

The other more likely possibility is that Keel were part of the pro-MC network from the start and went down to Point Pleasant to deliberately assist in weaving a legend around the events there and to add mystical spin and lies to cloud the actual truth.  If so, he certainly succeeded.  In either case, the events there are and always will be clouded in mystery and myth and MC is better covered thereby.

In any case, it is certain that director Mark Pellington's and screenwriter Richard Hatem's version of Keel's version of the events in Point Pleasant most certainly IS a prime example of contemporary creative media MC.  Its conformity to the events in Point Pleasant is minimal at best.  For example, there was no Washington Post reporter or author named Leek, both characters loosely conforming to John Keel, himself.  Mary Kyle, the Point Pleasant reporter, was transformed into a police officer, and many of the details were modified.  For example, the number of people killed in the bridge collapse was changed from 46 to 36 in order to adorn the number with religious numerology overtones (i.e. 666) and to drop clever lines like "36 people died" (i.e. bad people).  Other hints at such numerology pop up here and there within the film as well (see below).  Also, there was no prophecy involved.  Occasionally, MC insiders will attempt to emulate prophecy by planting suggestions, signs and other phenomena and later spin those events or engineer other events that relate back to the earlier ones so as to appear to have been predicted by them.  Miss Kyle's recurring dream of finding herself surrounded by Christmas presents while drowning may actually have been an example of artificially induced dreaming, perhaps an effort to hammer her for accepting improper gifts or other things of value as part of the nefarious psychological warfare going on there.  She did not dream, "Wake up, number 37." [more numerology] as portrayed in the film.  One must begin to wonder if 'based on' is a meaningful term at all in modern filmmaking.

Several current day people and probably a few historical ones are most likely being needled/mirrored in the film in the usual way of creative media MC, which is also useful in a general way.  Recall that Mark Pellington also directed 'Arlington  Road' about a fictional suburban engineer terrorist wannabe, which obeys the usual formula of creative media MC.  Some of the many known attack tactics that are still being applied as part of contemporary MC are included in the film, some of which were probably also applied in and around Point Pleasant.  Those include:

A pattern melted into a steel grille, loud beeping noises, creaking and howling sounds, manipulation of images on television screens, mysterious phone calls with no answer or mechanical sounding voices on the other end that, when analyzed, appear to have characteristics of electrical impulses, 'men in black' running around doing weird things and asking weird questions, a phone ringing that is not plugged in, a car that shuts down for no apparent reason, migraines, perception of hearing voices, induced hallucinations and the ability of persons unseen to literally read one's mind and recognize words that one is reading from a book.

Although many of the phenomena appear very different, they may all be myriad variations upon one single known technology - the ability to focus energy upon (and measure the presence of energy within) highly localized points in space from a distance, which can be rapidly modulated, scanned, steered, etc.  And so-called 'crop circles' (not appearing in this film)?  Probably just one more variation upon the same technology.

Standard creative media symbolism and suggestions in the film include:

"A little after 6" (numerology), "This'll really make them sweat.", "Big house" (a euphemism for prison), making out "in the closet", "There's something wrong with me", red tumor in the brain scan, "The universe points at you and says, ah, there you are.", "She was drawing angels.", ruin in the drawings, "Parties are demonizing each other.", suggestion of communication through the wire, cat picture on the wall, "Smallwood" - a phallic suggestion and a derivation of the name "Woody", Avalon, Ohio state line (suggested in Close Encounters as well), "She's my gal" mural on the wall, 6302 address (numerology), "Year old reports" - "Embarassed to be bringing it up", "really weird feeling", 35s (suggestive of 555, a number that appears in "The Devil's Advocate" and whose meaning I do not know), making out in the back seat, blood from girlfriend's mouth possibly suggestive of fellatio, bleeding eye possibly suggestive of marijuana smoking, a look in the mirror, "not my reflection", cat scan, indians shooting buffalo pictured on the wall, "like dreams", Christmas presents, letting herself sink, "trapped in hellish death realms", "They cause disasters.  Why would they need to?", burdened statues, "If there was a window washer up there and a car crash happened, I'm sure he could see it.", "Have you ever tried explaining yourself to a cockroach?", A child figure that peers suggestively, Christmas celebration, "Do you remember the last time you were happy?", "This is your wake-up call.", the bogus name "Indrid Cold", mirror sybolism, death by exposure to the cold, an image in a mirror that doesn't match the original, flashing red light on the phone, "Crossroads of America", "One day I started hearing voices", "We're not allowed to know", dilated eyes on the bridge, "36 people" (numerology), Jesus, "Your father lived in a green house on Monroe St.  You don't remember how your mother looked.",  "Ok, you got my attention.", Cherry Flavored Chapstick, "A broken smile beneath her whispered wings." (cut to a police car speeding toward the camera).  "It depends who's looking."

Finally, the catastrophic collapse of a steel bridge that leads to scores of deaths is a rare thing, certainly when there is no clear explanation like a jetliner flying into it, major design flaws or particularly bad maintenance.  Also, people who find themselves targets in MC operations even today discover just how ruthless their persecutors are willing to be, as long as they need suffer no consequence themselves.  In view of those facts and the conjunction in time with the other events in and around Point Pleasant that are clearly MC oriented, it is reasonable to assume that the bridge was brought down intentionally.  If so, a mass murder, a crime more profound than any other activity that went on in that small town still remains to be solved.  Perhaps they were experimenting with ways of frightening an entire region into conformity and filling both the town's inhabitants and numerous other people with a belief in psychic, ghost, angelic and other phenomena that would persist long after.  After all, the film does clearly suggest religious symbolism and numerology, suggesting that the moth 'creature' were actually a winged angel or that there were an angelic component to the events in Point Pleasant, which of course there was not.

Will suggestive insinuations like the film and the myth substitute for facts in the minds of most Americans?  Yep.  As long as they're entertained.  And Americans prefer a good movie, a good mystery, gossip, rumor and the astrology column to boring facts anyway.

The brain has always been a battlefield. New weapons might be able to hack directly into your nervous system.

Details of this emerged in a heavily-censored document released to Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Project under the Freedom if Information Act. Called “Sensory consequence of electromagnetic pulsed emitted by laser induced plasmas,” it described research on activating the nerve cells responsible for sensing unpleasant stimuli: heat, damage, pressure, cold. By selectively stimulating a particular nociceptor, a finely tuned PEP might produce sensations of say, being burned, frozen or dipped in acid -- all without doing the slightest actual harm.

The skin is the easiest target for such stimulation. But, in principle, any sensory nerves could be triggered. The Controlled Effects document suggests “it may be possible to create synthetic images…to confuse an individual' s visual sense or, in a similar manner, confuse his senses of sound, taste, touch, or smell.

'Moscow's Remote Controlled Heart Attacks' at DefenseTech.org

The American military may want to attack the nervous system, with pain rays and laser plasma pulses. But they're not the only ones. The Russians have long studied such systems, too -- including one weapon that could, in theory, remotely trigger heart attacks.

Technologies of transparent manipulation and messaging are far more advanced than what a few hapless public domain reporters and scientists are digging up and writing about.  Targeted individuals have known it for years.  In fact, we are some of the guinea pigs for those developments.  Some of those technologies are well beyond the development stage and are in actual operation, including the ultimate technology - nothing less than the sophisticated surveillance, decipherment and manipulation of brain activity at a distance, whether that involves implants or no in-body intermediary at all.
 

(Civil Action 92-0449)

My knowledge of the National Security Agency's structure, national security activities, proprietary technology,and covert operations to monitor individual citizens. A subject's bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment NSA cryptologists can remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can be decoded into a person's brain-states and thoughts. The subject is then perfectly monitored from a distance.

NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the Signals lntelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA's computers will then pinpoint and track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out and track anyone in the U.S. NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MKUltra program of the early 1950's, which included neurological research into "radiation" (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The resulting secret technology is categorized at the National Security Archives as "Radiation Intelligence," defined as "information from unintentionally emanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not including radioactivity or nuclear detonation." For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject's verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain's auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject's brain and show images from the subject's brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject's eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject's brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.

There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the U.S. since the 1940's. The NSA, Ft. Meade has in place a vast two-way wireless RNM system which is used to track subjects and non-invasively monitor audio-visual information in their brain. This is all done with no physical contact with the subject. RNM is the ultimate method of surveillance and domestic intelligence. Speech and 3D sound, and subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject's brain (bypassing the ears) and images can be sent into the visual cortex. RNM can alter a subject's perceptions, moods, and motor control.

Speech cortex/auditory cortex link has become the ultimate communications system for the intelligence community. RNM allows for a complete audio-visual brain-to-brain link or brain-to-computer link.

Perhaps some forward thinking reporter out there will someday think to ask Lieutenant General Alexander if the NSA does in fact consider the electromagnetic emanations from the brain to be technically a 'broadcast' signal, if it has the capability to surveill them from a distance and if it considers such emanations fair game for surveillance domestically.

The Boston chapter of PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (PHR) last month refused to examine or treat government implant victim Brian Wronge, against the protest of some of its members.

Further examination revealed miniature radios implanted in the membrane of Wronge's eardrums, according to a research biologist who examined Wronge with a OTOSCOPE. Use of such radio implants by CIA-funded experiments had been rumored since the 1960's, when individuals testified that institutes in UTAH had been using them on prisoners in that state without the victims' knowledge.

Requests through the Freedom of Information Act to obtain documents on the UTAH experiments, to this date, have not been complied with.

A federal Eastern District Court Judge, Justice REENA RAGGI, has Wronge's lawsuit against the state of New York pending, instructing Wronge to find a surgeon to remove one of the implants. However, in the three years since the May 1991 lab reports, no surgeon would remove the implants, usually citing FBI RETALIATION as the reason.

On July 21, a staff member stated, "No one here is allowed to speak with you. I was told to say that," mentioning that the director gave the silence order prior to a vacation.

The tense atmosphere at PHR following the Wronge denial was also evident among board members who refused to discuss details of the behind-the-scenes dialogue, although two of them revealed through various conversations that they were subjected to INTENSE CAMPAIGNING BY COLLEAGUES NOT TO SUPPORT PURSUIT OF THE ISSUE. Dr. CAROLA EISENBERG, vice president of PHR, was eager to help Wronge in late April but, in May, was discouraged from doing so after a conversation with STOVER.

The PHR decision was highly controversial, considering the group's documented statement of purpose - the basis on which it is supported by their large MEMBERSHIP. The statement includes the following mandates:

Since PHR's inception in 1986, it repeatedly has rejected suggestions to address medical misconduct by government agencies. "We may have a case of a group that is not pursuing the very issues its membership is MAKING LARGE CONTRIBUTIONS to see rectified," said one member of the Boston group.

Mr. Roger Hutcheon
The City Sun Newspaper

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' clear understanding that the sophisticated and complex electronic surveillance and other electronic [devices] can be ‘used in tandem with surveillance technologies' and ‘other electronic devices' or ‘other sophisticated electronic surveillance devices ought not be permitted in a free society." (Id. Koyomejian)

The Supreme Court has issued prior decisions which support the issuing of injunctive relief for Plaintiff Schlund which involve a wide range of scientific and other electronic force technologies admittedly used not only by the United States Government, but others as well. See, Central Intelligence Agency v. John Cary Sims and Sidney M. Wolfe, 471 U.S. 159, 85 L Ed. 2d 185 S.Ct. 1881 (1965).

In the case before the bench, Plaintiff Schlund has been and is pretextually and judicially branded as a criminal and was set-up by sloppy, dirty, and corrupt government agents who got caught by the Honorable Federal Judge Lacey who held they committed "outrageous" acts of fabrication of evidence, witness tampering, obstruction of justice and other severe and repetitive acts of immoral and grossly unethical conduct under color of authority and office. The officials themselves were radical and uncivilized criminals violating federal law. They should have been jailed.

The Honorable Federal Judge Lacey after acquitting plaintiff while standing and beating on his desk demanded that the corrupt federal agents be arrested for perjury and yelled that no one commits perjury in his court.

The corrupt agents nearly ended up in jail themselves on sua sponte contempt charges vigorously voiced on bedrock of anger by United States District Court Judge Lacey. The judge's clear expressions were in essence that the corrupt and dirty cops were the actual criminals not Plaintiff Schlund who was merely painted as a criminal in the bogus and fabricated proceedings marshaled against him by the DOJ and DEA. (Id.)

Plaintiff Schlund's statements have been consistently reliable for over twenty-five (25) years since he was acquitted. He has passed two (2) independent lie detector tests, despite the proof is not admissible in court. Also, his Verified Complaint is construed as an affidavit, which is acknowledged under Rule 56(e), which can be relied upon for purposes of granting injunctive relief.

As to the nature of the technology and the raw reality of the government torturing its citizenry, here for Plaintiff Schlund, as bizarre as it may seem, the reality of torture has been firmly recognized in the Siderman DeBlake case supra. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals expended great effort to give strong and credible weight to the factual reality of torture of citizens by the government under its reliable pattern of always denying it.

The government has no interest in trying or convicting Plaintiff for any purported crime, the government's only interest is to torture plaintiff to limit his freedom of speech and whistle-blowing activities. To imprison Plaintiff would look like the government was imprisoning him as a political witness. In fact Plaintiff Schlund would be a political prisoner of the United States. To give the illusion of freedom Plaintiff Schlund is allowed to appearingly remain free while in reality he is held prisoner electronically and controlled to a degree more horrible then possible in any prison without the use of the electronic implants used to torture Plaintiff Schlund.

I continued my trips to Washington on other projects, one of which was a contract research project with the National Science Board on Technology Transfer.  Just prior to that, there had been hearings on the MK-Ultra program involving the use of non-lethal weapons on civilians within the United States, especially dissenters.  So I fit that profile because I had dissented from the suppression of this study.

I will recite three separate occasions on which I experienced non-lethal weapons of either an electronic or chemical form that were directed against my person.  They were intentional intrusions.

I am talking about what in common parlance is called mind-control weapons.  These are weapons of an electromagnetic nature which can be used against a target civilian which can stun them, be used to deter them, and which can be used to induce states of various panic and delusional states.

They are generally applied in an integrated fashion with ground personnel, such that, if you are a targeted individual, a dissident within the government or someone with knowledge that they want to keep private, they will target your profile.  And they will use an electromagnetic weapon to affect your mind while you are surrounded by ground personnel in the form of agents to induce paranoia in you.

Enough of that and a person can be destabilized economically and can be destabilized from a health point of view.  So I experience this in three separate instances following the termination of this project.  The first instance was while I was on a contract research proposal trip to meet with an assistant secretary level person in the Pentagon.  I was escorted in by an Officer of the Pentagon and I was brought into the anteroom of the Assistant Secretary and told to wait there. I was there in a professional capacity.

Across from me was seated a woman, I wasn't sure what she was, the Secretary of whatever.  All of a sudden she takes a large placard and lifts it up like this and on this placard is a term calculated in the mind-control technology to induce what is called "cognitive dissonance", to shake up the target.  On that placard was written in large letters, "S-E-X".

Because of my years of research in this area I knew exactly what was taking place.  I was being tele-guided into a mind-control for the purpose of destabilizing me so that when I met with the Assistant Secretary I would be more shaken up - and if I told this tale I would be discredited, because how could this happen within the halls of the Pentagon?

Fortunately from my research, I knew exactly what was happening and I didn't panic, I just sat there and endured that episode.  The subsequent episodes became more serious.  I was on my way back to Palo Alto and stopped in New Orleans to see a brother of mine, but 'also had an appointment with Judge Jim Garrison on issues having to do with the House Select Committee on Assassinations in which the Chairman, Heary D. Gonzalez, had appointed me one of the public watchdogs.

My meeting with the Judge was at the New Orleans Athletic Club on a Sunday morning and on Saturday I went with my brother to visit the King Tut exhibit and all of a sudden I got physicallyt ill.  I went into massive hallucinations.  I was disoriented.  I was forced to change my schedule.  I could not meet with the Judge and I could barely make it back to the airplane Sunday night to go back to Palo Alto.  When I went to the airport I was surrounded by covert ground personnel, dressed in suits, like agents.

I knew from my professional research in the mind control area that these are mind-control personnel calculated to come in on a targeted individual in a weakened condition and induce paranoia and destabilize that individual.  Fortunately, because of my research, I was able to continue to Palo Alto and make it through this experience although it was very trying.

I went to the Pentagon and I was hit.  I got on the airplane to New Orleans and I was hit again.  Then, I got back to Stanford Research Institute and I was hit.  It was as though the order had been given out to take me out after the proposal had been terminated.

Although Dr. Webre was a believer in UFOs, that is understandable, as sensationalism surrounding UFOs was at its height in the mid seventies and was apparently being heavily employed as cover and disinformation for MC research and application.  So, those false beliefs are forgivable.  Otherwise, he was obviously an authoritative and lucid professional with enough presence of mind to understand his situation.

[*248] 33. On or about the 28th day of November 1996, at approximately 12:32 a.m. Plaintiff was admitted for a 3rd time at the Massachusetts General Hospital Emergency Room, suffering from severe Abdominal Infection and high fever.

34. Plaintiff was examined by attending trauma physician, JONATHAN N. ADLER, M.D., who ordered, and caused to be carried out, X-rays of Plaintiff.

37. Radiologists RIEUMONT and KlM conducted x-rays of Plaintiff, the results of which were received by Plaintiff, through Collateral Litigation, and showed the following:

41. Plaintiff was forced to lie down where he was searched, handcuffed and placed into custody by these agents.

42. Defendants GAMMEL, FARLEY, ROBERTO, KELLY, PETERSON, DESMOND,  CUNIFF, SOILES, QUIGLEY and several JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES, took part in the arrest of Plaintiff stated in paragraphs number forty (40) and forty-one (41) above.

43. While in the custody of agents, Plaintiff was approached by Defendant ROBERTO, who attempted to gain Plaintiff's authorization and signature on a document.

44. The document stated in paragraph forty-three (43) above was purporting to be an "authorization" for the surgical removal of an electronic device from Plaintiff's body.

45. Defendant [**9] ROBERTO, informed Plaintiff, that Plaintiff had been implanted with an "a microchip tracking device" and law enforcement (Drug Enforcement Agency/Federal Bureau Investigation) had been tracing Plaintiff since on or about November 25, 1996.

46. Defendant ROBERTO, further stated to Plaintiff that it was on "on loan" to Drug Enforcement Agency from the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) and was a sophisticated state of the art piece of equipment, cost a lot of money. Must be returned to the CIA.

47. Defendant ROBERTO, assured Plaintiff that he (Plaintiff) would be released on bail if Plaintiff would [*249] sign documents and consent to surgical removal of device.

48. Plaintiff refused to sign the consent forms. Defendant DESMOND stated "Nobody will ever believe we did this".

50. While being transported from the Logan International Airport to the field office, Defendant's FARLEY, and QUIGLEY, continued to entice Plaintiff to consent to the surgical [**10] removal of the device.

51. Upon arrival at the Field Office, Defendant FARLEY, directed Plaintiff's attention to an office door within the Field Office building that displayed the name plate of one "Dr. STEIN."

52. Defendant FARLEY, advised Plaintiff that Dr. STEIN was the individual responsible for conduction, or causing to have conducted, the surgical implantation of the device, in Plaintiff.

53. While at the Field Office, Plaintiff was subjected to identification process (i.e. Finger printing, Photographs, etc...).  While there Defendant SOILES stated "The implant in you, the devices capabilities are tracking and listening. We used the Massachusetts General Hospital Medical Doctors and Nurses and our own physician to do a clean implant while you were under General Anesthesia". Defendant JOHN GAMMEL agreed and said we knew where you were from Boston to Nevada to Arizona. State of the Art Device.

54. Upon the completion of identification process Plaintiff was transported to the Braintree Police Station (Braintree) for housing.  Defendants: DEA Agents; KELLY & PETERSON Transported Plaintiff and [**11] also tried to convince plaintiff to consent to removal of Device.

55. While being taken from the Field Office to a vehicle for transportation to Braintree, one of the Principal Defendant's (possibly Defendant CUNIFF), informed Plaintiff that, "He (Plaintiff), was the only person with the device on the East Coast" and went on to mention another person implanted with the device on the "West Coast".

56. During the discussion stated in paragraph number fifty-five (55), above this Defendant further mentioned the source of "device" as the Central Intelligence Agency.

[*250] 61. During the Bond Hearing stated in paragraph number sixty (60) above; Defendant FARLEY, testified that he heard the conversation at Logan International Airport between Defendant Roberto, and the Plaintiff in which Defendant ROBERTO, informed Plaintiff about the Plaintiff being implanted with a "device" which monitored Plaintiff activities.

62. Defendant FARLEY, further testified that it was his belief that ROBERTO, was merely joking with the Plaintiff regarding the "device".

63. Upon adjournment of the January 6th Bond Hearing Plaintiff was returned to the Central Falls Facility for housing.

64. On June 14, 1999, a hearing was conducted (without the presence of Plaintiff) at the Federal Court Building Worcester, Massachusetts before the Honorable NATHANIEL M. GORTON, U.S. District Court Judge, at which time Judge GORTON, ordered Assistant U.S. Attorney's JEFFREY AUERHAHN, and CYNTHIA YOUNG, to ascertain whether or not agent's discussed a device being implanted in Plaintiff, and whether such implantation did occur.

65. As a result of Judge [**13] GORTON'S, June 14th Court Order the record reflects that certain Defendant's did in fact advise Plaintiff that a device was implanted in him, however, these Defendants were allegedly joking and there was no implantation of such device in Plaintiff.

66. On the 25th day of May, 2000, the Honorable JOSEPH TAURO, United States District Judge, ordered the government to cause to be affected and M.R.I. on Plaintiff to conclusively ascertain the existence of any electronic device implanted in the Plaintiff.

67. Judge TAURO's, May 25th Judicial order stated in paragraphs number 66 above, has to this date not been effectuated.

68. Plaintiff was under Federal/State investigation and surveillance, and monitoring at the time of and prior to Plaintiff's admission at Massachusetts General Hospital for gunshot wound.

69. As a product of discovery process conducted in a malpractice lawsuit against Massachusetts general Hospital, et al. (Case No: 99-5655H), Plaintiff has procured conclusive medical evidence that there did exist a foreign "artifact" inside Plaintiff at time of x-rays conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital, as set forth in paragraph [**14] numbers 36 and 37 above. This device remains inside Plaintiff.

The federal defendants assert that plaintiff's claim accrued on December 15, 1996, (more than two years before plaintiff initiated this civil action) when Defendant [**23] Roberto informed plaintiff that "a microchip tracking device" was implanted in plaintiff, and requested plaintiff's authorization for its removal. The court, however, cannot at the same time credit federal defendants' assertion that plaintiff's claim about the planting of a "microchip tracking device" is frivolous and credit federal defendants' assertion that at the time of that incident plaintiff knew or should have known "the fact of injury" to the plaintiff.

It is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life.  Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved.When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person.  Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person’s brain via the microchip to be reexperienced.  Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target's performance.  With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads.

The mass media has not reported that an implanted person's privacy vanishes for the rest of his or her life. Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or consent of the implanted person.

This “silent war” is being conducted against unknowing civilians and soldiers by military and intelligence agencies.  Since 1980, electronic stimulation of the brain (ESB) has been secretly used to control people targeted without their knowledge or consent.  All international human rights agreements forbid nonconsensual manipulation of human beings — even in prisons, not to speak of civilian populations.

Are we ready for the robotization of mankind and the total elimination of privacy, including freedom of thought?  How many of us would want to cede our entire life, including our most secret thoughts, to Big Brother?  Yet the technology exists to create a totalitarian New World Order.  Covert neurological communication systems are in place to counteract independent thinking and to control social and political activity on behalf of self-serving private and military interests.

One reason this technology has remained a state secret is the widespread prestige of the psychiatric Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV produced by the U.S. American Psychiatric Association (APA) and printed in 18 languages.  Psychiatrists working for U.S. intelligence agencies no doubt participated in writing and revising this manual.  This psychiatric "bible" covers up the secret development of MC technologies by labeling some of their effects as symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.

Neil Davison, Nick Lewer
March 2006

For police and security sector services this ethical and social problem is not going to go away. It will, in essence, become a bigger issue, as the new technologies start to mature, and offer a wider range of technological opportunities (with associated socio-political implications) to those responsible for law and order. It will test potential linkages between the temptation of using such technologies for the ‘political control’ of populations, and the police-state relationship.

Neuroscience and the military

In early 2006 the think tank Demos and the Welcome Trust published a collection of essays entitled Better Humans? The Politics of Human Enhancement and Life Extension. In his contribution, Professor Steven Rose, a leading neuroscientist based at the Open University, warns of increasing military interest in emerging technologies that may enable the manipulation of the brain:
 

He points to the use of electromagnetic energy to manipulate the brain:

Ostensibly DARPA’s interest in TMS is in enhancing the performance of US soldiers, as described on the web site of its Defense Sciences Office:

However, given the current interest in directed energy and  suppressive/incapacitating weaponry, it is hard to imagine that this technique is not under consideration for use as a weapon. Other means of manipulating the nervous system using electromagnetic beams certainly are. In the ‘Directed Energy’ section of this report we describe research sponsored by the US Air Force that seeks to use electromagnetic energy to manipulate the nervous system by altering neurotransmitter release.

Russia is also conducting research into the use of electromagnetic radiation to manipulate the nervous system.
 

Bioelectromagnetic weapons

A final report on a three-year US Air Force funded project to study the effects of
radiofrequency (RF) energy on nervous system function gives some insight into an area of weapons development where there has been much speculation but little available information over many years. Two researchers at the University of Nevada, Reno, Dr. Gale Graviso, an Associate Professor of Pharmacology in the School of Medicine, and Dr. Indira Chatterjee, a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering, have been investigating the use of RF energy to manipulate the release of neurotransmitters in the nervous system with a view to developing an incapacitating weapon. The research project, entitled Sensitivity to Neurotransmitter Release to Radiofrequency Fields, ran from 1 June 2002 until 31 May 2005 under contract number F49620-02-1-0306 with the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) for $357,652. The abstract of the final report136 is very clear about the purpose of the research undertaken:
 
 

Experiments were conducted on nerve cells from the adrenal medulla section of the adrenal gland. The adrenal medulla controls release of the catecholamine neurotransmitters adrenaline and noradrenaline into the bloodstream. The main observation given in the final report on the research is that they found an increase in release of catecholamines from these cells as a result of exposure to certain frequencies of RF energy.

A second concurrent three-year research effort (‘Project 2’) being conducted by the same researchers, which began on 1 June 2003, has been funded by the ‘Department of Defense Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (DEPSCoR)’ and the University of Nevada, Reno with a total of $750,000. This project is not only looking at influencing the nervous system with RF radiation but also affecting muscle contraction:
 
 

Having learnt about these projects we looked for any announcements about the research at the time of the initial funding award in 2003, and we found a University of Nevada press release from March 2003 that is deeply deceptive. Not only does it omit any reference to the sole purpose of the research, i.e. development of “novel immobilizing weaponry”, but it also claims that the research is for beneficial therapeutic purposes:

As regards the broader issue of whether it is in any way acceptable to develop
bioelectromagnetic weapons that could have an incapacitating and suppressing effect on people by manipulating their nervous system or their muscles, the University of Nevada’s 2003 press release and its evident omission answers this question for us.

Dr Steve Wright - Director of the Omega Foundation
A Draft Paper Presented To The Expert Seminar On Security Equipment & The Prevention Of Torture
25-26 October 2002. London, UK

This paper covers the emergence of new sub-lethal, incapacitating and paralysing technologies and their coming role in the mass production of torture, cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment. It grew out of the work the Omega Foundation has undertaken for Amnesty International (on electroshock, restraining and torture technologies), the European Commission, the European Parliament and Landmine Action. Throughout its existence, Omega has tracked technologies, particularly less lethal weapons) deployed by the police, military and security services to create human rights violations, including weapons used in torture.  However, such technologies have always been seen by us as multi-functional, weapons of flexible response rather than specifically designed just for a role in torture.

For many years the US used so called non-lethal weapons in its prisons, for crowd control and often in conjunction with lethal force during war such as the massive use of CS in Vietnam against combatants and non-combatants alike. A key strand of such work involved the creation of non-lethal weapons for interrogation or as Peter Watson has put it, war on the mind.  After World War II, many countries examined the use of chemicals for the manipulation of human behaviour and a rich seam of pharmacological work opened up to facilitate these needs and the creation of mechanisms to induce, debilitation, dependence and dread.

Directed Energy or Radio frequency Weapons using the microwave part of the electromagnetic spectrum are probably the most controversial area of development. They are discussed in Non-Lethal Weapon circles but little in the way of hard data is provided given their sensitivity. They are seen as offering a potential rheostatic or tunable response from less-lethal; to lethal. Already demonstrated is the ability to induce a heating effect up to 107 degrees F to induce an artificial fever. There has been much speculation but a dearth of hard data about such psychotronic weapons which are already worrying those concerned about bioethics. Such electronic neuro-influence weapons would be in breach of the recent EU resolution regarding technologies which interact directly with the human nervous system. Voice to skull technology has already been discussed in the literature.

We are supposed to believe that the major role of these disabling and incapacitating technologies is in creating harmless warfare. Work by the Omega Foundation in the past for the European Parliament reveals a pattern of such less lethal weapons being used both for punishment and for softening up dissenters before deploying lethal force. There is every expectation that the second generation of these technologies will find similar roles, especially if the companies making such weapons seek wider markets.

Without adequate international controls, we may end up with weapons of mass punishment, and gross human rights violation - taking torture out of the present tradition of 1 (or more) to 1; to a capacity where one person or group can torture or deliberately debilitate and punish 1-to many.

The debate on International Law and Non-Lethal Weapons is vitally important, if we are to establish the continuance of basic principles of what is and what is not beyond the limits of permissibility in the face of US attempts to define these weapons as lying outside such restrictions. They are not.

Some of the devices discussed above will find a future role in mass producing torture, cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment. Other technologies will follow as governments find ever new mechanisms to quell dissenters, punish civilians who would migrate into their territory, as well force multiplying tools or as surprise devices to immobilise combatants. At both the UN and the EU levels, we should attempt to enhance controls on such technologies which are anticipatory in that they can be applied to new devices and inventions on the horizon rather than just the single function torture weapons of old.

Alas, good laws, export controls and regulations do not guarantee good practice. Whatever controls are eventually agreed, it is sensible to assume that loopholes will be found accompanied by traditional denials of government and corporate collusion. Taking this as a starting point, it would be prudent for the responsible authorities to re-examine the resources needed both by customs and intelligence agencies to adequately prioritize tracking of malfactors in the future. It would also seem prudent to put in place further field research and audit procedures to ensure that the information required to monitor the torture trail enables a more prophylactic approach.

On September 20, 2006, US Representative Cynthia McKinney introduced House Resolution 1026:

For the re-opening of investigative hearings into the Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) and other intelligence and law enforcement programs and agencies, and an expansion of those hearings to include renewal of previously curtailed abuses, and other activities sanctioned by the USA PATRIOT ACT.

Whereas the Congress condemns any abuse of human, civil, and constitutional rights undertaken by Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies and agents;

Whereas the Congress acknowledges the violations of law perpetrated by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducted under the Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO), and other intelligence agency and law enforcement programs such as CHAOS, GARDEN PLOT, CABLE SPLICER, LANTERN SPIKE, and others, which targeted the leadership of progressive social movements and implemented extra-constitutional aggregations of executive power or martial law;

Whereas the Congress recognizes the findings of the Church Committee which identified COINTELPRO and related activities as an illegal, extra-judicial effort designed to disrupt and destroy opposition groups and movements, and anti-war protest, among others;

Be it further resolved, That Congress intends to renew legislation that will end these abuses and fully protect the constitutional, civil, and human rights of all U.S. citizens and others who fall under the protection of our laws and international laws and treaties the United States is signatory to.

(Full NPR Interview)

Although not as well known as 'The Women of Brewster Place', '1996' is Miss Naylor's most important work by far.  The amazing thing is that it could be written while under attack at all.

"The administration has created a regime of torture" said Rubenstein. "Decisions by civilian and military leaders including Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld have permitted these types of techniques. It is a drastic departure from values laws and practices long enshrined and embraced by military and civilian investigative traditions.

Dr. Michael Persinger, a psychologist and neuro-scientist, "did research on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on the brain for a Pentagon weapons project".  He has worked in the field for 40 years and has been funded by the Navy and reportedly the NSA as well.  Persinger says brain processes can be circumvented by direct induction of this information within the brain…the basic premise is that synthetic duplication of the neuroelectrical correlates generated by sensors to an actual stimulus should produce identical experiences without the presence of that stimulus."  He is saying that virtually any mental state can be artificially injected into a human brain…from an exterior source.  The most frightening thing is that the means for doing this already exist in a fully operational form on a worldwide basis.

"The power levels for these amplitudes are similar to those associated with the signals (generated globally by radio and communication systems)… Within the last two decades a potential has emerged which was improbable but which is now marginally feasible.  This potential is the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species…by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed." 

Persinger's message, minus the jargon, is that the entire human race can be mind controlled through the use of electromagnetic influence piggybacked on television and radio networks or other technical means.  (Kieth 207)

The paper asserts that "for continued success as a superpower" the key is "information dominance".

Part of this dominance will be the development of a space satellite-linked Information Integration Center, or IIC, which will act as a central information processing and control center.  The IIC will monitor people who have been implanted with a "microscopic brain chip…(the) chip performs two functions.  First, it links the individual to the IIC, creating a seamless interface between the user and the information resources (in-time collection data and archival databases.)  In essence, the chip relays the processed information from the IIC to the user.  Second, the chip creates a computer generated mental visualization… 

"Implanting "things" in people raises ethical and public relations issues".  In the future, "The civilian population will likely accept an implanted microscopic microchip that allows military members to defend vital national interests".   The paper goes on to note that "The California Institute of Technology has developed an energy efficient computer chip which emulates the analog thinking of the human brain…when this capability is fully mature, this chip could provide the baseline for a brain implant hooked to all the sensory segments of the brain, not just the eye".  (Kieth pg 223)

From “New World Vistas”
a book published in 1996 by the US Air Force Advisory Board

We will have achieved a clear understanding of how the human brain works, how it really controls the various functions of the body, and how it can be manipulated (both negatively and positively).  One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscle movements, control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and long term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set.

It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction.  When a high power microwave pulse in the gigahertz range strikes the human body, a very small temperature perturbation occurs.  This is associated with a sudden expansion of the slightly heated tissue.  This expansion is fast enough to produce an acoustic wave.  If a pulsed stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible.  Thus, it may be possible to talk to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.  (Kieth 223)

Dr. John Norseen, a Lockheed Martin neuroengineer, is conducting research into reading and interpreting "brain prints," sponsored by NASA, DARPA and the Army’s NGIC. One possible application mentioned is scanning passengers’ brain patterns in airports to search for a terrorist’s (as usual) brain profile.

If this research pans out, says Norseen, "You can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even before they know it." But Norseen says he is agnostic on the moral ramifications that he’s not a mad scientist-just a dedicated one. Dr. Norseen said, "The ethics don’t concern me, but they should concern someone else."

“We are at the point where this database has been developed enough that we can use a single electrode or something like an airport security system where there is a dome above your head to get enough information that we can know the number you're thinking," he adds.

Dr. John D. Norseen
Systems scientist for embedded systems
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Marietta, Georgia

U. S. Patent #5,159,703 dated October 27, 1992
Inventor Dr. Oliver Lowery of Norcross, Georgia

Silent Sounds, Inc. states that it is interested only in positive emotions, but the military is not so limited. That this is a U. S. Department of Defense project is obvious. Edward Tilton, President of Silent Sounds, Inc., said, "The system was used throughout Operation Desert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully."

Far from necessarily being used as a weapon against a person, the system does have limitless positive applications. However, the fact that the sounds are subliminal makes them virtually undetectable and possibly dangerous to the general public.

These weapons were recently transferred from the Department of Defense over to the Department of Justice. Why?  There are international treaties that exclude weapons of this nature in international warfare.

In other words, weapons that are barred from use against our country’s worst enemies (not withstanding the fact that the US did use this weapon against Iraqi troops!) can now be used against our own citizens by the local police departments against such groups as peaceful protestors of U. S. nuclear policies.

The secrecy involved in the development of the electromagnetic mind-altering technology reflects the tremendous power that is inherent in it. Whoever controls this technology can control the minds of all men.

As recently as last month [February 1998], this stonewall approach of total denial or silence on the subject still held fast, even toward committees of the U. S. Congress!

Airport security screeners may soon try to read the minds of travelers to identify terrorists.

Officials of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration have told Northwest Airlines security specialists that the agency is developing brain-monitoring devices in cooperation with a commercial firm, which it did not identify.

Space technology would be adapted to receive and analyze brain-wave and heartbeat patterns, then feed that data